Which Smart Contract Blockchain Is Right for Your Project?
Do you have a revolutionary idea to run on a blockchain?
But you are not certain which blockchain is the best fit. Hang on tight; we'll cover them all just below with no fuss.
There are many smart contract blockchains, but a lot of them at the experimental stage, so we are going to take a look only at top dogs.
Ethereum
The first in the game and de facto standard in the industry.
Pros:
- Big and strong community.
- A lot of educational materials.
- Tools for creating, testing and deploying smart contracts exist and decent quality.
- Tools for creating dApps.
- Easy to hire developers.
Cons:
- Terrible performance – 15 transactions per second.
- Users have to pay fees in order to interact with smart contracts.
- Hard to update and modify smart contracts.
For who?
Public decentralized projects such as ico, voting system, auction, and governance.
EOS
New challenger holds spot #5 by capitalization. EOS looks to address Ethereum weaknesses and already gained an attention of millions.
Pros:
- EOS will support at least 1000+ transactions per second at the start.
- Low Latency Block confirmation – 0.5 seconds.
- Smart contract platform powered by Web Assembly.
- Inter Blockchain Communication.
Cons:
- Hard to hire developers.
- Not truly decentralized – blocks produced by a cartel of 21.
- Not many tools and libraries.
For who?
Public decentralized projects with focus on performance such as decentralized exchanges.
Hyperledger Fabric
Hyperledger Fabric was introduced by IBM. It is more a toolbox for blockchain rather than a particular blockchain. It is worth to mention that Hyperledger Fabric is private and has no cryptocurrency.
Pros:
- 1000+ transactions per second.
- Modular architecture. Use only what you need.
- Permissioned. Share data only with whom you want.
Cons:
- Hard to hire developers.
- Not many tools and libraries.
For who?
Private permissioned projects for enterprise.
Have any questions left?
We love to talk about blockchain projects.